Friday, December 9, 2011

Palawan Tribes Go Cyber to Keep Out Nickel Miner

Palawan Tribes Go Cyber to Keep Out Nickel Miner 

By Melody Kemp 

PALAWAN – When big global mining companies set their sights on the Philippine island of Palawan, one of the world’s remaining ecological hotspots and home to many traditional tribes, little did they suspect their China-backed, billion-dollar extraction plans would be met by social media-fueled resistance.
Indigenous people in Palawan have organized globally to raise awareness about their plight and to save their ancestral lands from planned large-scale strip mining. One activist group, the Ancestral Land and Domain Watch (ALDAW), has made use of social media tools like Facebook and Twitter to transform what was originally a local movement into a vibrant global environmental campaign.
“We have to struggle to maintain interest and momentum,” said Artiso Mandawa, a Palawan leader who is rarely seen without his laptop.
The story is a familiar one in Asia: a rich and politically connected mining company wins a government concession granted without local level consultations to exploit precious minerals in an ecologically sensitive area. In this case, MacroAsia, a Philippine miner listed on the local stock exchange, won the right to dig nickel from areas of Palawan, some of which have been recognized by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization as a “Man and the Biosphere” reserve.
MacroAsia, majority owned by Filipino tycoon Lucio Tan, started exploration in the area in 2010 and plans to begin operations in April 2012, according to recent company statements. The company holds a mineral production sharing agreement over a 1,114-hectare area and has estimated the mine holds nearly 88 million tonnes of nickel ore. Nickel is used in the production of stainless steel.
China’s Jinchuan Group recently agreed to provide funding for a US$1 billion nickel processing plant in Palawan. The Philippines is China’s second leading supplier of nickel and much of the ore mined in Palawan will be exported to China. President Benigno Aquino agreed to $14 billion worth of mining-related investments with China, including an expansion of MacroAsia’s Palawan plans, during his state trip to Beijing in August.
Normally these powerful political and economic forces win out over local sentiments and grievances in the Philippines. But Palawan’s mix of ecological wonder, historical significance and cultural uniqueness has drawn a local and global response to the planned mining activities, one that Aquino’s supposedly reformist administration is finding difficult to ignore. On November 10, a group of indigenous people and farmers protested against Jinchuan’s mining plans in the Palawan city of Brooke’s Point, a rare public display of overt anti-China sentiment in the Philippines.
What’s yours is mine

High in Palawan’s mountains, indigenous Pala’wan and Taqbanua people live in rudimentary leaf shelters and use sleds in preference to wheeled vehicles. Some live in locations so remote that the national census fails to count their numbers. Yet their desire to stay in their deep forest and their right to do so is being beamed out from laptops tapped on by tech-savvy indigenous leaders.
Archaeologists discovered that tigers thrived on Palawan around 12,000 years ago, having entered from Borneo via the Balabac strait. The tigers are now extinct but local people have reported that various other wild cats survive in the remote area. Recent discoveries of until now unknown species in Borneo give hope that Palawan’s unexplored hinterlands may also yield undiscovered species.
Meanwhile, the cloud-soaked mountains of Palawan are home to some of the biggest stands of carbon sequestering natural forest left in Asia. These forests are rich in endemic biota, many endangered species and well represented on the Red List of endangered species compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Palawan is also known as the cradle of Philippine civilization, an area where relics of the earliest Philippine settlers have been uncovered. Local people here have traditionally traded high value resins and other non-timber forest products as well as agricultural produce from swidden and sustainable forest farming.
In contrast to this timelessness, ALDAW’s Facebook page is the epitome of modernity with a 10-million signature campaign, photographs of the former Filipino ambassador to Italy Romeo Manalo signing on to protect the wilderness, and various embedded videos of their activist activities. So far, its online petition has secured 6,000 signatures. The Philippines is among the top 10 users of Facebook in the world, sending the group’s message far and wide. In true Filipino style, the campaign to save Palawan against mining even has an official song.
But can enough “likes” on a Facebook page save a forest? In March 2006, former president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo moved to revive the moribund mining industry, making it a central plank to her government’s national economic strategy. This included the contract tendered to Macro Asia to mine nickel in Palawan. The results of the policy, however, have been devastating for many local communities.
Across the country, open-pit and strip mining has flattened mountain tops, polluted water courses, and felled huge stands of primary and secondary forest. On the resource-rich southern island of Mindanao, a series of high-profile executions of anti-mining advocates has led to rising tension and community fear.
Concessions have been given to many foreign investors, including small-scale Chinese miners; who activists say have shown scant concern for the natural environment in their operations. As global commodity prices rise, foreign interest in the Philippines unexploited mineral riches is rising, particularly in nearby China.
On Palawan, indigenous Tagbanua, Batak and Pala’wan people are now fighting back armed with laptops and Web 2.0 applications. In collaboration with Dario Novellino of the University of Kent’s Center for Biocultural Diversity (CBCD), they have produced videos to provide communities across the Philippines with more information on the ecological and social consequences of large scale mining.
“The companies had been approaching individual villages and people making wild and attractive promises,” Mandawa said. “We wanted to give them information from the other side, so they make decisions based on knowledge not on pressure or dreams.”
Other technological tools have been used to challenge MacroAsia’s claims to environmental consciousness during its exploration phase. For instance, hi-tech geo-tagging has appeared to show that mining area claims have pushed deep into ancestral domain lands and legally protected eco-zones.
Maps of the intrusions have been loaded onto a Facebook page and linked to Google maps alongside an online petition calling for a halt to mining activities in the area. (This correspondent flew over the area where gaping holes in the ancient forests were already widely evident.)
Generational roots 
Before the arrival of Spanish colonialists, Palawan’s peoples – the Batak, Tagbanua and Pala’wan, among others – had a complex civilization complete with participatory forms of government, an alphabet and codified trading with seagoing merchants. Families here trace their immediate families back seven or eight generations.
Even now, most continue a traditional life, eschewing cities and modernity. The Pala’wan clans maintain a system based on specialized castes, blacksmithing, botany and plant-based medicines, marine and coastal management, and (cyber) warriors to protect their interests. MacroAsia has been aggressive in its attempts to win local acceptance for their mining plan, including outlays for so-called “social and management development programs.”
“The mining company took our elders to the stinking cities,” Mandawa said, “and enticed them with electronic gadgets, mobile phones, TV’s. By the time they came back to the village they were infected with a belief that we will all have such things if the mines go ahead. Those who oppose mining never get inside the door. If we ask questions, we are escorted out.”
Now he and others have turned the tables, using those same electronic gadgets brought back from the cities to fight back against the miners.
“We made videos in communities that had experienced mining so that the information could be shared,” said Mandawa. “Those people told of broken promises, of being poorly paid wage slaves in their own land, of hunger and rivers where the fish had died. Seeing that and hearing words from the old people gave the communities more resistance to the sweet words.”
Their campaign, however, has been met with violence.
Gerardo Ortega, an environmental advocate, radio journalist and program manager of Philippine Ecotourism Palawan, was shot and killed with a bullet to the head earlier this year. In Ortega’s news reporting, he had criticized mining companies, including their alleged practice of using of fake tribal leaders to speak in support of mining in public hearings held notably in Manila, not Palawan.
“His death gave us energy to fight harder,” said Artiso, a poster on ALDAW’s Facebook page. His murder was covered in the national and international press, and has rallied the segments of the global Filipino diaspora, many of whom had hoped for a change, not murder as usual, with Aquino’s election in mid-2010.
MacroAsia had earlier claimed that 50 tribal chieftains and around 80% of the indigenous people in the Brooke’s Point area around the mine have welcomed the project – an assertion ALDAW has strongly refuted. In an August 29 press release, ALDAW argued that the position of “tribal chieftain” does not adhere to any customary definitions or community leaders in Palawan and that the position was invented to fit the interests of large corporations and government agencies.
MacroAsia has leveraged the claim of local support to receive a “certificate of precondition” from the Palawan Council for Sustainable Development, which the company needs to commence full mining operations in the area. It is still awaiting a final permit to begin large-scaling mining in the area.
Global links
Despite its global component, the campaign so far has met with only limited success. Aquino’s government recently announced a moratorium on certain small-scale mining activities. MacroAsia’s type of large-scale mining planned for Palawan has not been affected by the official order.
“The moratorium is not a great success. It only prevents small-scale mining. It’s the large-scale mines which could bring Palawan’s biocultural diversity to an ultimate end,” said Kent University’s Novellino. “Yes, the pressure mobilized through the use of the web and e-mails was really conspicuous, and from different institutions.”
“But no international campaign can succeed unless it is backed by locally grounded efforts. Before ALDAW was created, Palawan NGOs had no unitary and campaign strategy,” said Novellino. “It was only through ALDAW that active collaboration and communication was established between the villagers, national advocacy bodies such as Alyansa tigil Mina (Alliance Against Mining) and international support.”
The campaign has also recruited other groups, such as Survival International and Rainforest Rescue, into the Palawan movement, which is now beginning to focus on the additional environmental threat of large-scale palm oil plantations, a nascent industry here that has devastated large swathes of forestlands in neighboring Malaysia and Indonesia.
The IUCN’s Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy and others have provided space for placing video clips into their own websites, to provide additional and different coverage of the Palawan situation. At the same time, activists and analysts say its important to maintain momentum to sustain the campaign and push back against MacroAsia’s plans for the area.
“Pressure can only be kept alive with novelty and news to elaborate the cause for which the people are fighting. In that sense, it is essential to have new documentation available: new videos, new geo-tagging evidence, new updates to keep the news and the campaign always on the move,” said Novellino.
“This is why ALDAW has put so much energy into participatory videos and field documentation. If you recycle the same news and stories, the vigor of the campaign is diluted.”
One new angle has been to put pressure on the United Nations. UNESCO’s Office in Jakarta said that its “Man and the Biosphere” ranking for biodiversity hot spots deferred to national sovereignty in relation to land-use issues. After a social media-fuelled call to act, UNESCO has since promised to investigate the claims made by ALDAW and others.
Melody Kemp is an environmental journalist currently living in Indonesia.
(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Resource Depletion Damages Third World - World Bank

Resource Depletion Damages Third World - World Bank
Published Date: 15-09-2005

On precisely the same day both the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Programme have come out with reports which attempt to "revalue" natural (including mineral) resources, against the negative consequences of their continued depletion, and consequent environmental damage. Sceptics might consider it a bit ripe for the Bank to tout conservation while continuing to back projects that destroy "natural capital". Perhaps better late than never - but is it already too late?
Resource Depletion Damages Third World - World Bank
Story by Ed Stoddard, Planet Ark
September 15, 2005
JOHANNESBURG - Resource depletion and surging population growth are draining the net "savings" of the world's poorest countries and could cripple future generations, according to a new World Bank study.
It said a new measure of wealth -- which goes beyond the traditional gross domestic product yardstick -- showed many developing countries were sinking deeply into the red.
"Accounting for the actual value of natural resources, including resource depletion and population growth, shows that net savings per person are negative in the world's most impoverished countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa," it said.
Entitled "Where is the Wealth of Nations?", the study looks at resource extraction and other variables not commonly used. "Current indicators used to guide development decisions -- national accounts figures, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) -- ignore depletion of resources and damage to the environment," the World Bank said in a statement.
"Where is the Wealth of Nations? ... offers new estimates of total wealth, including produced capital, natural resources, and the value of human skills and capabilities, which show that many of the poorest countries ... are not on a sustainable path."
Swiss on top, Ethopia bottom
The study offers a ranking of 118 countries, with Switzerland topping the list with wealth per capita of $648,241. At the bottom is Ethiopia at $1,965.
Also near the bottom is the Indian Ocean island of Madagascar, which has rapid population growth, rampant deforestation and is losing much of its soil through erosion.
Densely populated and ecologically stressed Burundi -- also a powder-keg of ethnic conflict -- is second from the bottom. The study says natural capital -- the value of minerals, energy, forests, pastureland, cropland and protected areas -- is a much higher share of total wealth in low-income countries than produced capital at 26 percent compared with 16 percent.
Produced capital is defined as machinery, structures and urban land.
The study looks at "intangible capital", which it says is calculated as the difference between total wealth and the sum of produced and natural capital.
There are bright spots in the developing world where resource wealth is being saved rather than squandered.
"Mauritania has improved its development prospects through better management of fishery resources, while Botswana has successfully used diamond resources to finance the schooling, health care, and infrastructure which have supported its high rate of growth," says the World Bank.
"(A) sound combination of macroeconomic and natural resource management has permitted Botswana to avoid the 'resource curse' that has afflicted many oil producers," it says.
Many African economies are heavily dependent on resources and critics say the cash generated in boom times are often wasted, leaving little for the busts of the commodity cycle.


Spending on Environment Yields Big Returns - Report
September 15, 2005
Story by Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent, Planet Ark
OSLO - Spending to protect the environment, from coral reefs to forests, can bring big returns to aid a worldwide assault on poverty, a UN-backed report said on Wednesday.
The study, coinciding with a summit of world leaders in New York, even suggested that forests may be more valuable when left standing rather than being cleared for crops because trees can absorb the heat-trapping gases widely blamed for global warming.
"The environment...is not a luxury good, only affordable when all other problems have been solved," said Klaus Toepfer, head of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) which was among 30 international groups behind the report.
The study estimated that annual investments of $60-$90 billion in the environment over 10-15 years were needed to reach a world goal of halving the proportion of humanity living on less than a dollar a day, currently more than a billion people.
A further $80 billion a year was needed to limit global warming, widely linked to gases from burning fossil fuels in factories, cars and power plants, over the next 50 years.
Once invested, it said that every dollar spent on clean water and sanitation in the Third World, for instance, could bring $14 in benefits ranging from lower health care costs to higher work productivity and school attendance.
"Conservation of habitats and ecosystems are also cost effective when compared with the short-term profits from environmentally damaging activities" including dynamite fishing, mining or deforestation, it said.
Every dollar invested in fighting land degradation and desertification, like building terraces to stop hillside erosion, could generate at least $3 in benefits, the Poverty Environment Partnership report estimated.
Corals beat dynamite
And every dollar invested in protecting coral reefs could generate $5, ranging from scuba-diving tourism to renewable fish stocks. Forests could play a role in slowing climate change because trees absorb carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas.
"The carbon storage or 'sequestration' potential of forests ranges between $360 and $2,200 per hectare which makes them worth far more than if they are converted to grazing or cropland," UNEP said.
And the study said that it becomes far more cost effective to conserve forests than to clear them once carbon prices exceed $30 a tonne.
In a European Union market, launched this year as part of a UN plan to curb global warming, carbon dioxide emission allowances trade at about 22 euros ($27.03) per tonne.
The report also pointed to other ways to place a value on the environment. Brazilian farmers in parts of the Amazon turned to forest nuts and berries when their crops failed, for instance, making the forests a "nature-based insurance policy." 

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Letter to the Edittor

Dear Editor, 

In the past few weeks the integrity of the Save Palawan Movement has been questioned. I need to make one thing crystal clear. We do not lie. The foundation of the Save Palawan Movement is Truth and the Common Good. The tables of Prof. Balisacan speak for themselves. In Mining the incidence of poverty is increasing. The tables do not say that mining has CAUSED poverty - but what the tables indicate - is that people involved in the mining sector stay poor year after year after year. Poor people also go to construction, agriculture, manufacturing - but the incidence of poverty in those sectors has been steadily decreasing. Why is mining the only sector where the incidence of poverty has been progressively increasing FOR THE LAST TWENTY YEARS?! Doesnt this say something about how the sector performs. 

I can confidently say - that if poor people get involved in community based sustainable eco torusim. THEIR LIVES WILL IMPROVE!! I know this from personal experience. Puerto Princesa, and Bohol show that tourism is the way to go. The Save Palawan Movement does not lie. The fact remains the highest incidence of poverty is in the mining sector AND IT HAS INCREASED BY 74% SINCE 1988!

When the Chamber of Mines can print that mining does not affect agriculture, fishery resources - and I have farmers and fishermen whose lives say otherwise - who is lying? When the Chamber of Mines say that mining does not affect tourism - and I have been to islands I can no longler help because there are huge pits that have permanently scarred the island - who is lying? When the Save Palawan Movement wants to save bio diversity in Palawan and wants to eradicate poverty through the care of the environment - and the mining takes advantage of that poverty to enrich themselves, who should Palawan be protected from?

Mining Sector Can't Deliver Jobs: Study


By Stella A. Estremera
Friday, December 2, 2011
Published in the Sun.Star Davao newspaper on December 03, 2011.
DAVAO CITY — A policy paper by the Ateneo de Manila University School of Governance (ADMUSoG) points to official records that show the mining industry does not deliver the promises of economic boom and job generation that those pushing for mining operations in Mindanao, among them National Government officials, are always saying.
In the paper entitled “Is there a future for mining in the Philippines?” released just Friday by ADMUSoG, a copy of which was emailed to Sun.Star Davao, it was pointed out that employment generation as claimed by those pushing for mining is but a drop based on official records at that.
Based on the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB), mining and quarrying sector has not even breached one percent in terms of employment contribution to the national total.
“Recent data has shown that it has been 0.5 percent since 2008 until 2010. So far, for the first half of 2011, contribution has been reported as 0.6 percent (in contrast to agriculture at 33 percent in 2011),” it said, adding even in other parts of the world, mining is a low employment generator.
“The Tampakan project, with expected investments of $5.9 billion, will provide only 2,000 permanent jobs,” it said.
The sector’s contribution to other sectors is also very small as compared to what other sectors are contributing.
Citing economist and former National Economic Development Authority Director General Cielito Habito’s paper for the Asian Development Bank in 2010 entitled, “An Agenda for High and Inclusive Growth in the Philippines”, it underlined the fact that labor compensation in the mining sector accounts only for 13.3 percent as compared to the average 20.7 percent in all other sectors.
“The sector has a backward linkage index of only 0.46, meaning there is relatively little input from other domestic industries; even the forward linkage of 0.82 indicates that the sector is below average compared to all other sectors in generating further domestic economic activities. Minerals are being exported with little value-adding that could have generated further employment and industry linkage,” the report said.
This simply means that benefits from mining operations do not trickle down nor ripple much.
MGB records show exports of minerals and mineral products averaged 4.5 percent of total exports and was at 4.3 percent in the first half of 2011, while exports of non-metallic minerals was a meager 0.4 percent for the past four years.
Agriculture, in comparison, has been contributing eight percent, while the main economic drivers remain to be the manufacturing and service sector, which contributes 50 percent of gross domestic product.
Admitting that there are few available studies on poverty incidence in mining areas, these few show no perceptible improvement in the lives of local residents where mining operations operate.
“In a recent study by Balisacan (Balisacan, Arcenio, 2011, Multidimensional Poverty in the Philippines: New Measures, Evidence, and Policy Implications), the poverty incidence among individuals engaged in mining has continued to increase, compared to workers in other sectors. In 2006, income poverty in the sector was at 34.64 and by 2009 it increased to 48.71,” the policy brief said, adding: “The mining sector also shows a high deprivation in health and education compared to other industries.”
It then points to a 2003 poverty incidence report by the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) where Bataraza in Palawan, where Rio Tuba has been operating nickel mining for the past three decades, poverty incidence is twice the national rate.
Bataraza is also in the bottom 25 percent of municipalities on poverty incidence, the report said.
What cannot be denied is that benefits from mining operations like new roads and other infrastructure is only while there is something to be mined. There are no economic benefits after the mines stop operating because the ore have all been extracted.
While all these and more seem to describe mining as based on official records, there is no study that quantifies social and environment costs.
Citing the recent attack on mining facilities in Surigao del Norte by the New People’s Army (NPA), the study said government should have an accounting of how much it costs to provide security for these operations, in terms of logistics and manpower for the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine National Police.
But there is no such data available. Operations that affect coastal areas are also costing local governments, like the ones in Negros Occidental and Ilocos provinces, because these have to invest in coastal ecosystem protection, but again, there is no study that measures this as part of the cost of mining.
Among other facts disregarded, the paper states, “Losses to government and community investments are not accounted for in the decision to allow coastal mining.”
Given the facts of how little mining contributes and what is not being measured in terms of its costs to local governments and communities as well as the National Government, the paper continued: “Is this a responsible thing to do – to base decisions on guesswork? Should we exercise caution instead? How much benefit will we forego if we decide to exercise precaution? Can we afford to gamble our future for so little benefit that extends to so few? Can we afford the cost of conflicts that leave so many with ill feeling, which could prevent cooperation in more inclusive productive activities? Unless we gain a better handle on the value of what we lose in exchange for mining, we have no rational basis for decision-making.”
More so, it urged the National Government to recognize the rights of indigenous peoples and local governments to say no to mining, as talks are growing louder that President Benigno Aquino III will be coming up with a new mining policy that will curtail the role of locals in deciding the fate of big mining companies that intend to dig up their mountains.
“We, the current generation, are potential beneficiaries of mining operations. But we must remain aware of our responsibility as caretakers of our nation’s wealth for the enjoyment of our children and their children. The country’s mineral resources are limited and exhaustible. Do we really have to pressure ourselves to cash in on the benefits now? The Ateneo School of Government’s position is that the country could wait for better conditions and negotiate better terms on the basis of better information,” the paper pointed out.
Stating that ADMUSoG is neither for nor against mining, it stressed that it does not shy away from “taking a principled stand on issues, after rigorous examination of facts and engaging stakeholders with different perspectives in honest and candid discussions.” (Sun.Star Davao/Sunnex)

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Let's make a stand

Save Palawan Movement: Our stand on mining

The Save Palawan Movement is not against all mining. However, we believe that key biodiversity sites (Specially Island ECOSYSTEM), where there are farmlands, coral reefs, mangroves and many endemic species should be off limits. Palawan is our rallying cry.

Biodiversity is IRREPLACEABLE

Mining will always be together with logging. I've seen it with my own two eyes. I spent my childhood years in a town (Lotupan, Toledo City, Cebu) that used to be the center of mining in Cebu. (ATLAS in the old days). But recently been re-open and renamed.(I'm not living there anymore so I'm not sure on its new name).

I never saw beauty in the damage that mining have done even from my younger years. I've seen my neighbors cry over dead family members who work in mines and meet their end there. I can only hear stories from my grandfather(He was a staff of the mining company) the unusual birds, native turtles, big snakes and lizards at their natural habitats, which were very many in his time but I can only see them inside a cage now and some no longer exist. I was fortunate though to still climb the remaining trees that was left, and while sitting on a branch, I saw it every time... the damage, the eroded mountains, the stripped greens, the masterpiece that took hundreds or even thousands of years in the making, destroyed. Back then I thought the forest will just rejuvenate itself because there is no more mining going and maybe they've done some reforestation... I was wrong.  
After I finished my primary education I left that town and came back over 6 years later. That time the mine has been re-open a year before my arrival. Everything was smaller when I came back. The house, my old room, even the mango tree I used to climb up to the highest branch. I was surprised that that branch is now almost twice as smaller than my arm though the trees' height remains the same. But, there is one thing that didn't seem to be smaller than it was. I thought it should be, but no. In fact it almost tripled its size the last time I remember it. Yes, it is that hideous view.I didn't like it. I was like wth?! That new mine surely knows how to succeed its predecessor. Raping mother nature again and again denying her the chance to heal itself. You are sick! There is no way we can repair the damage that mining have done back to its original complexity. We have to face the fact that we are not GOD. The way the nature form itself cannot be done in human time. We can't imitate something that complex and intricate which its creation took longer than our lifetime. We can try but it won't be pure nature as it is and will be mixed with our flaws and corruption. True we can change our environment for our benefits but always remember that mother nature does know how to counter-punch us of our actions in a killer knock out force.
Now enough with something that we can no longer save. And focused on what we DO can.

PALAWAN.

Do you know that one of the new seven wonders of nature is here in the Philippines?
Yes, I voted for it some years ago and so happy it made itself to the rankings.
For those that didn't know what I'm talking about check this site:
http://www.new7wonders.com/
Under The Provisional New7Wonders of Nature    
You'll see our very own puerto-princesa-underground-river
Do you know which part of the Philippines it is?
Try to look at the map below:


View Larger Map

Zoom out a bit(Use the minus "-" button on the top left) and maybe it will resemble something you saw in the Philippine map.
Familiar? Yes, it is in PALAWAN. Imagine that, one of the new seven wonders of nature is in the Philippines.
Would you want that to be blemished or worst destroyed by mining? Me? NO!
But hey, How can Mining hurt that?
Well, mining is basically removing minerals from the land. To do so, they will need to cut down trees, no trees, no roots, erosion will occur, when rain comes, mine tailing which is toxic will eventually travel with the water, some go underground, some will flow to the agricultural area, making our land unusable, then of course the end part is always be the ocean and hit our coral reef and kill our fishes, then our own wonder is at risk including the wildlife and fellow men in there.

Palawan, has the majority of the only 3% remaining old growth forest of the Philippines.
That 3% percent is the home of 17 key Bio Diversity Sites, 7 protected areas and 2 heritage sites.
When damage is done, restoration is not attainable even with reforestation so it will be lost forever.
The mining company operating in Palawan boast that they planted and grown 800,000 trees in their 238 hectare of mined-out land. It could be true, and if it is, then we are screwed. Why? Surely, if that species of trees could grow in toxic land then they absorb toxic which makes them toxic as well. Therefore infecting other naturally growing trees so as herbivores and the ones connected to the food chains including us.
So yeah, whether you like it or not. You are involved. You're maybe far but it will get you eventually. How? Look at the melting ice caps, was it near? Yet you can't turn off your fan or air-conditioner anymore. That's because you're feeling it. The heat I mean. Do you eat Fish or other sea food? You know where they live right? Don't they travel? Do you know that 50% of fish supply in Manila is from Palawan? Well I live in Cebu, I should be safe. Wait..I do know some fish port for fresh fish, but I'm not sure on which sea they get them...I remember, I have a friend at High School whose father do some major fishing stuff and If memory serves me right I think I heard him saying they go to..OMG Palawan. Well I'm not sure where they sell it though....fishermen goes to a lot of places.

Now enough with that, you may think I' scaring you guys.

How do I prevent bad things to happen?

Well, of course you still can save yourself.
How?
Here are the ways online:

http://no2mininginpalawan.com/2011/04/01/5-ways-you-can-help-save-palawan-right-now/

or
Download the petition sign-up sheets and collect signatures:
english version:
          http://no2mininginpalawan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/No2MINING-SIGNATURE-EngJRS.jpg
tagalog version:
        http://no2mininginpalawan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/No2MINING-SIGNTagalogJRS.jpg


LET YOUR VOICES BE HEARD!
SAY NO TO MINING IN PALAWAN.
SIGN and SAVE PALAWAN.
SIGN and SAVE YOURSELF.